Search Jobs Sign Up Log In
Home  |  Magazine  |  For Employers  |  Contact Us  |  FAQ
17,372 JOBS 4,717 NURSING JOBS 2,551 ALLIED HEALTH JOBS 8,363 MD JOBS 1,258 OTHER JOBS 2,414 EMPLOYERS

Scalpels, Pens, & Public Opinion

 

What happens when a doctor talks politics? It certainly appears as though doctors are tailor-made for the task. We listen to them, we trust them, and doctors really care about us. But doctors face certain hazards when stepping out of the OR and into the public spotlight.

Howard Dean and the "Doctor Factor"

Howard Dean, one-time frontrunner in the race for the Democratic Party leadership, found this out the hard way – in the editorial pages of The Washington Post.

At the height of the 2003-2004 leadership campaign, with his reputation as an "opinionated," "angry," "stubborn," "disrespectful," "arrogant," "hot-headed," "short-fused," and "abrasive" man already cemented in the media, the Post's op-ed writer, Marjorie Williams, delivered the coup de grâce and labeled it the "Doctor Factor." Dean was a doctor and that really bothered her. "Where else but in medicine do you find men and women who never admit a mistake," she opined. "Who talk more than they listen, and feel entitled to withhold crucial information? Whose lack of tact in matters of life and death might disqualify them for any other field?"

Why was Dean so hard hit by the media? After all, when a tenured professor of literature makes controversial statements about politics (as they often do), very few people care. But that wasn't the case with Dean, a doctor. In fact, Williams' disparaging comments even seemed to ring true, despite what we all know – that doctors consistently get high ratings on public opinion surveys looking at honesty and integrity among professionals. And who wouldn't want honesty and integrity in a politician?

Of course, for every Dr. Jekyll, there's a Mr. Hyde. Even though we think they're trustworthy, doctors also have an established reputation for being arrogant, abrasive, opinionated, and stubborn. And this is the reputation that Williams capitalized on. Indeed, to her credit, she recognized that in the game of politics, anything that makes the other side look bad, including negative stereotypes about personalities (and bedside manners!), is valuable – and fair – ammunition.

Territory and Jealousy?

The truth is that all of these apparently negative characteristics also apply to your average journalist – at least those who frequent the op-ed pages, such as Williams. And maybe the root of the problem isn't a matter of personalities and stereotypes, but rather one of jealousy and protecting one's turf.

It's easy to dismiss the odd professor, with his tweed jacket and pipe, who has ventured out of the ivory tower. But it's not as easy to dismiss the opinion of a doctor, whether it's on paper or not. Everyone knows, after all, that doctors deal in matters of life and death, not vague notions of right or wrong in the broadest sense of political ideologies or philosophical ideals.

And then there's the larger issue of professional envy. As writer Martin Mosebach suggests, "both writers and physicians have their sights on people." Frankly, what op-ed writer wouldn't want to be able to take the pulse of the nation, or have the intuitive smarts to diagnose the public situation with a quick examination of the symptoms? What scribe wouldn't give their soul for the trust and authority that doctors impart? There are, after all, some very good reasons that doctors never admit to mistakes, speak more than they listen, and sometimes withhold information, but that's another issue altogether.

Their Secret Weapon?

The good news for doctors is that, in the end, this type of pigeonholing may, in fact, be their secret weapon when it comes to "talking politics" – at least in today's Crossfire-filled world of media attack dogs, political punditry, and spin.

Qualities like arrogance, hotheadedness, and decisiveness, may not endear doctors to us, but let's face it – taken together, they represent the most popular and successful approach to discussion on Sunday morning political shows and in the op-ed pages of newspapers. Doctors have the advantage that most of us believe there's a bit of substance to their rhetoric. We trust doctors – and that, combined with his "abrasiveness" – may have been the real reason for Dean's popular support, despite Marjorie Williams' polemics.

After all, the truth in politics – or at least the other side of the argument – has always been a bitter pill to swallow. It doesn't mean that doctors will always be right, but I hope that doesn't stop them from putting pen to paper.

 

Discuss This Article

Have something you'd like to say? Tell us what you think! Read and post comments for this article.

Like this article? Read more! Browse our archive of 1,077 articles.

Also, see our master index of all MedHunters articles!

 

Find a Job

Choose your career:

MedHunters is the world's biggest healthcare job board. Our job directory has 17,372 jobs with 2,414 hospitals and other direct employers.

We want you to find your next job on MedHunters. Need Help? Call us at 1-888-884-8242, email us at info@medhunters.com or sign up now.

 

Have an article or story for MedHunters? Email us today at submissions@medhunters.com.

Article published on May 19 05 12:59AM.

General
Departments

Link to This Article

Like this article? We do too, and we want it to get read, so we'd love it if you would link to it.

Also, if you're interested in republishing the article, please contact us for more information.

MedHunters Email: info@medhunters.com Call Us: 1-888-884-8242 Candidate Employer Privacy Contact Us FAQ Terms of Use Signup for our newsletter Photo credits for this page

© 1996-2008 MedHunters. All rights reserved.