This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on ISI (13)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Topic Collections  • Pain  • Randomized Controlled Trial  • Facial Plastic Surgery  • Biomaterials and Implants  • Alert me on articles by topic

A Randomized Trial

Karl B. Landorf, PhD; Anne-Maree Keenan, MAppSc; Robert D. Herbert, PhD

Arch Intern Med. 2006;166:1305-1310.

Background  Plantar fasciitis is one of the most common foot complaints. It is often treated with foot orthoses; however, studies of the effects of orthoses are generally of poor quality, and to our knowledge, no trials have investigated long-term effectiveness. The aim of this trial was to evaluate the short- and long-term effectiveness of foot orthoses in the treatment of plantar fasciitis.

Methods  A pragmatic, participant-blinded, randomized trial was conducted from April 1999 to July 2001. The duration of follow-up for each participant was 12 months. One hundred and thirty-five participants with plantar fasciitis from the local community were recruited to a university-based clinic and were randomly allocated to receive a sham orthosis (soft, thin foam), a prefabricated orthosis (firm foam), or a customized orthosis (semirigid plastic).

Results  After 3 months of treatment, estimates of effects on pain and function favored the prefabricated and customized orthoses over the sham orthoses, although only the effects on function were statistically significant. Compared with sham orthoses, the mean pain score (scale, 0-100) was 8.7 points better for the prefabricated orthoses (95% confidence interval, –0.1 to 17.6; P = .05) and 7.4 points better for the customized orthoses (95% confidence interval, –1.4 to 16.2; P = .10). Compared with sham orthoses, the mean function score (scale, 0-100) was 8.4 points better for the prefabricated orthoses (95% confidence interval, 1.0-15.8; P = .03) and 7.5 points better for the customized orthoses (95% confidence interval, 0.3-14.7; P = .04). There were no significant effects on primary outcomes at the 12-month review.

Conclusions  Foot orthoses produce small short-term benefits in function and may also produce small reductions in pain for people with plantar fasciitis, but they do not have long-term beneficial effects compared with a sham device. The customized and prefabricated orthoses used in this trial have similar effectiveness in the treatment of plantar fasciitis.

Author Affiliations: Department of Podiatry, School of Human Biosciences, La Trobe University, Australia (Dr Landorf); Academic Unit of Musculoskeletal Disease, University of Leeds, Leeds, England (Ms Keenan); and School of Physiotherapy, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia (Dr Herbert).

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Impact of Chronic Plantar Heel Pain on Health-Related Quality of Life
Irving et al.
J. Am. Podiatr. Med. Assoc. 2008;98:283-289.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Letter to the Editor
Garcia-Campos and Ortega-Diaz
Foot & Ankle Specialist 2008;1:186-187.
 

Plantar Fasciitis: Evaluation and Treatment
Neufeld and Cerrato
J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2008;16:338-346.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

What's New in Foot and Ankle Surgery
Marx and Mizel
JBJS 2008;90:928-942.
FULL TEXT  

Shock wave therapy for chronic plantar fasciopathy
Rompe et al.
Br Med Bull 2007;0:ldm005v1-26.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Customized or Prefabricated Foot Orthoses Improved Function Only in the Short Term in Patients with Plantar Fasciitis
Younger
JBJS 2007;89:458-458.
FULL TEXT  

Orthotics for Plantar Fasciitis
JWatch General 2006;2006:5-5.
FULL TEXT