Journal of Nutrition Animal Diets/Enrichment Products...

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Savastano, D. M.
Right arrow Articles by Covasa, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Savastano, D. M.
Right arrow Articles by Covasa, M.
© 2005 The American Society for Nutritional Sciences J. Nutr. 135:1953-1959, August 2005


Nutritional Neurosciences

Adaptation to a High-Fat Diet Leads to Hyperphagia and Diminished Sensitivity to Cholecystokinin in Rats1

David M. Savastano2 and Mihai Covasa

Department of Nutritional Sciences, College of Health and Human Development, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802-6504

2To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: dms493{at}psu.edu.

Rats fed high-fat (HF) diets exhibit reduced sensitivity to some peptide satiety signals. We hypothesized that reduced sensitivity to satiety signals might contribute to overconsumption of a high-energy food after adaptation to HF diets. To test this, we measured daily, 3-h intake of a high-energy, high-fat (HHF, 22.3 kJ/g) test food in rats fed either low-fat (LF) or HF, isoenergetic (16.2 kJ/g) diets. During testing, half of each group received the HHF test food (LF/HHF; HF/HHF), whereas the other half received their respective maintenance diet (LF/LF; HF/HF). Rats fed a HF diet ate more of the HHF food during the 3-h testing period than LF-fed rats (HF/HHF = 7.7 ± 0.3 g vs. LF/HHF = 5.5 ± 0.2 g; P = 0.003). Rats tested on their own maintenance diets had similar intakes (HF/HF = 3.2 ± 0.2 g vs. LF/LF = 3.7 ± 0.3 g), which were lower (P ≤ 0.008) than intakes of rats tested on HHF. HHF-tested rats did not differ in body weight by the end of wk 2 of testing. In a subsequent short-term choice preference test, rats exhibited an equal relative preference for HHF irrespective of their maintenance diets (HF = 63.1%, LF = 68.1%, P = 0.29). Finally, we examined the effect of intraperitoneal NaCl or cholecystokinin (CCK)-8 (100 and 250 ng/kg) injection on 1-h food intake. Both doses of CCK significantly suppressed food intake in LF-fed rats but not HF-fed rats. These results demonstrate that chronic ingestion of a HF diet leads to short-term overconsumption of a high-energy, high-fat food compared with LF-fed cohorts, which is associated with a decreased sensitivity to CCK.


KEY WORDS: • dietary fat • satiation • obesity • energy density • appetite




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
M. R. Hayes, C. K. Miller, J. S. Ulbrecht, J. L. Mauger, L. Parker-Klees, M. D. Gutschall, D. C. Mitchell, H. Smiciklas-Wright, and M. Covasa
A Carbohydrate-Restricted Diet Alters Gut Peptides and Adiposity Signals in Men and Women with Metabolic Syndrome
J. Nutr., August 1, 2007; 137(8): 1944 - 1950.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
H. Shi, A. D. Strader, S. C. Woods, and R. J. Seeley
Sexually dimorphic responses to fat loss after caloric restriction or surgical lipectomy
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, July 1, 2007; 293(1): E316 - E326.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
C. Gallou-Kabani, A. Vige, M.-S. Gross, C. Boileau, J.-P. Rabes, J. Fruchart-Najib, J.-P. Jais, and C. Junien
Resistance to high-fat diet in the female progeny of obese mice fed a control diet during the periconceptual, gestation, and lactation periods
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, April 1, 2007; 292(4): E1095 - E1100.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]