School Crossings - Fixing the Budget
12 04 2008The school board has been receptive to getting at the problem earlier rather than later. It is my job to recommend how we balance the budget. It would be easy to look back at former board members and administrators and criticize, but the fact is that Menomonie’s budget woes are primarily related to declining enrollment and how the state aid formula works against districts that find themselves in that situation. Although the district enrollment increased this year, the overall trend is disturbing, with a decline of over 300 students in the period 2000-2007. That kind of decrease spells trouble and requires either a revenue boost through a referendum—or cuts. Given the economy, and the fact that I hear people asking for stability before considering a referendum, we need to cut.
At last month’s board meeting I quoted FDR. “We know that self-serving interests are bad ethics; we now know that they are bad economics.” That is a little harsh but his point was that it is human nature to put on the blinders when it is time to cut. The other guy’s program always looks less important. That’s why we have school boards and administration. They are the only ones with a 360-degree view of all programs. As the process starts, some may ask for more input, for consensus, for meetings, and so on. Someone once said that when brown spots form on the banana, it’s too late to call a committee meeting. In fact, there has been input. It’s uniquely American and it’s the most powerful form of input there is. It is called a school board election. As the founding fathers conceived it, the whole point of representative democracy is to remove decision making from special interests and place it in the hands of folks who are elected to see all issues. That is why school districts that elect single-issue candidates experience heightened conflict.
I am sorry to have to tell you this, but I am going to advocate decisions that not everybody likes. However, the worst mistake an administrator can make is to promise something that cannot be delivered. There will be no win-win in this budget. It is a tough situation, and we will make tough decisions and bring the budget in line. And frankly, as a taxpayer, why wouldn’t you want strong executive leadership in this situation, especially if you believe school leaders need to be more accountable? The tighter a leader’s hands are tied, the more accountability is diminished. You can’t fire a committee of volunteers. You can find yourself a new leader if you are not satisfied. Too much decentralizing of decision-making balkanizes school districts into tiny interest communities that battle, or even worse, ignore each other.
When I was the superintendent at tiny Barneveld, WI, we had a tornado. Twelve people were killed, including my athletic director and a student. We did not call a committee meeting or hold hearings. I asked for help and received it, but many decisions had to be made quickly and unilaterally. Fortunately, the structure permitted it and the school recovered much quicker than predicted.
State school board associations, and your own experience, will tell you that the pool of viable superintendent candidates, particularly among women and minorities, is drying up rapidly. It is easy to see why. The best candidates I talk to want no part of a school paranoia that eschews strong leadership. The idea that we can fix school problems by disorganizing and decentralizing is counterintuitive. During the process, we are not going to make everybody happy. We are going to balance the budget. I hope you will give us time and judge us on the result.
Categories : School Crossings
Trackbacks : No Trackbacks »
