Featured Employer
Healthcare in Australia - Medhunters Medical Community
By Stephen Duckett PhD
healthcareInAustralia image

Australia is roughly the size of the continental United States, but has a population of only 19.6 million. It has a federal government (properly known as the Commonwealth) and governments for each of the six states and two territories.

Q: 
What kind of health system does Australia have?

A: 
The Australian healthcare system is mixed. Responsibilities for healthcare are divided between the federal and state governments, and both the public and the private sectors play a role.

Australia spends about 8.5% of gross domestic product on healthcare, which compares favorably to spending in countries such as the United States (13.7%), Canada (9.5%), and England (7.0%).

Government programs underpin the key aspects of healthcare. Medicare, which is funded out of general tax revenue, pays for hospital and medical services. Medicare covers all Australians, pays the entire cost of treatment in a public hospital, and reimburses for visits to doctors.

There is no limit on fees charged by doctors. There is, however, a government-set fee schedule. Doctors can bill patients or send their bills directly to the government insurance authority, the Health Insurance Commission (HIC). If sent to the HIC, the payment is 85% of the government-set fee for out-of-hospital expenses and 75% of the government set fee for in-hospital services; the money is paid directly to the doctor, and the doctor is not allowed to charge the patient an additional fee. About 75% of family physician services are directly billed to the HIC. If a doctor bills the patient directly, the patient then applies for the rebate of the government set fee.

Public hospitals are owned by the state. About 70% of beds are in public hospitals, and major teaching hospitals are public hospitals. Budgets for public hospitals are usually set on the basis of their case-mix, using an Australian version of Diagnosis Related Groups. In the past, the majority of private hospitals were owned by charitable organizations, but for-profit corporations – which are listed on the stock exchange – now own an increasing proportion. Private, freestanding surgical centers are a rapidly growing phenomenon. Few private hospitals have emergency departments, so, in an emergency, most Australians rely on the public hospital system.

Australia has a Pharmaceutical Benefit Scheme (PBS), which subsidizes the cost of medication. The scheme covers most prescriptions with some exceptions, such as Viagra. (Before approving a drug to be listed on the PBS, the government assesses its cost effectiveness.) Aged pensioners and people on low income pay A$3.60 (US$1.94 at an August 2002 exchange rate) out-of-pocket for pharmaceuticals, while others pay A$22.40 (US$12.07) per prescription. Both schemes have "safety nets" on total expenditure for a patient or family in a year: after 52 prescriptions, pensioners receive prescriptions at no charge; all others after spending A$686.40 (US$369.94), pay A$3.60 (US$1.94) per remaining script for that year. Pharmaceuticals (including nonprescription medications) account for about 12% of total health expenditure compared to about 19% spent on medical services.

Q: 
How is the healthcare system funded?

A: 
Government pays about 70% of healthcare costs (approximately 47% from the federal and 23% from state governments); the remainder is paid by non-government sources, e.g., insurance and private pay.

The share of costs varies significantly across service types. Public hospitals, for example, are about 48% federal, 45% state, and the balance private sector funded. Medical services, on the other hand, are 82% federal funded with the balance paid mainly by the patient.

Private health insurance (which covers about 8.6% net of health costs) receives a 30% subsidy from the federal government. Everyone is eligible for this subsidy. And 45% of the population has private health insurance; for a family, it costs between A$1,000 and A$2,000 per year (US$539 to US$1,078). People buy insurance directly from the insurance company (not via an employer). Insurance products are not risk-rated.

Q: 
What is the quality of care in each system?

A: 
Overall, quality of care in Australia in both the public and private sectors is comparable to other developed countries. As in the United States, there is concern about the number of adverse events that occur in hospitals. The major teaching hospitals have significant research profiles and the care is first-rate. Suburban and rural hospitals are also seen as providers of high-quality care.

Q: 
What are the current concerns among healthcare workers in the country?

A: 
One of the worldwide fallouts of September 11 has been escalating costs of insurance and re-insurance arrangements, and this has placed pressure on the medical malpractice insurance in Australia. The major medical malpractice insurer in New South Wales (pop. 6.5 million) and Queensland (pop. 3.6 million) has recently collapsed, leaving doctors without coverage in their private work (state governments provide coverage for public hospital care).

Longer-term issues include concerns about the potential shortage of nurses in most states and the adequacy of equipment and capital funding, and general questioning about the level of financing of the system.

Q: 
What are the current concerns among patients?

A: 
The Australian healthcare system is in relatively good shape. Out-of-pocket costs are moderate and access to emergency care is good. However, there are a number of concerns for people without access to the pensioner-level subsidy for pharmaceuticals, especially for the chronically ill.

There are also extensive waiting times for elective surgeries at public hospitals. Although waiting lists for the most urgent elective surgery for heart disease and cancer are almost nonexistent, there are long waiting lists for orthopedic surgery (median wait for total hip replacement is 88 days; 10% of patients waited over 345 days in 1999 to 2000), and cataract surgery (median is 73 days; 10% waited more than 316 days). One of the attractions of health insurance is the ability to bypass public hospital waiting lists.

There are also problems of access in rural Australia. Although there is a flying doctor service and increased use of telehealth services, the very small populations in rural areas do not receive the same level of specialist cover and access.

There is also a significant problem of the health status of Australia's 427,000 indigenous people, with the life expectancy at birth for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people being 20 years below that of the total population.

Comment from Robyn Lewis
Good article. I live in the USA. I recently fractured my wrist and for outpatient surgery, one ER visit and 2 doctor office visits the cost so far is around $50.000. Yes, that is fifty thousand dollars and most of it is not covered by health insurance as I lost my employer sponsored coverage when I lost my job. Good job Australia. The care is generally good when accessed but the delivery system is barbaric. It is a disgrace. Better to be an illegal immigrant, then health care is free, no questions asked!

Comment from Mike
The Australian system is about as good as modern health care systems can get. The US needs to take the employer out of the healthcare equation.

Comment from Edward
The American system of health care is headed for a crash if we don't make some changes, seems like Australia has things under control.

Comment from Erika Avellaneda Celis
Great article. I needed the info because I am writing to my congressmen and ladies to vote for a health care system that promotes choice, and allows affordable care for every America. I spent 4 years in Australia, was in the public heal thcare system and found that the bottom line is. Australia puts its people first, not its profit. I hope to help make a change here but am in the process of becoming a permanent resident in Australia. They have got it figure out.

Comment from Maria
I am an Aussie living in America and I have to say the health care system over here has always been very frightening to me. Great if you got it, but very pricey, and well you could be in very big trouble if you don't have any. My experience with the public system in Australia has been very good. My daughter had pneumonia, great treatment. My father had cancer, unfortunately, and it was also very good care. This is the way to go, private and public systems. Private that is affordable and not attached to your employment.

Comment from Natalie
Thanks for such a fine article. I am an Australian currently living in the US and I honestly was thinking how darn lucky I was in Sydney with free health care. Even private health insurance is 3 times cheaper in Oz.....I was thinking of writing a similar article specifically aimed at improving the US health care system by trying to model it on the Australian system

Comment from Natalie
Thanks for such a fine article. I am an Australian currently living in the US and I honestly was thinking how darn lucky I was in Sydney with free health care. Even private health insurance is 3 times cheaper in Oz.....I was thinking of writing a similar article specifically aimed at improving the US health care system by trying to model it on the Australian system

Comment from Ray Schell
Good article. We need more of these comparisons in these days of health care discussions in the US.

Comment from Frank Williams
I am an Australian living in USA for past 15 years. Current health-care argument in US is clouded with ideological crap. Private for-profit entities are just incapable of providing universal affordable health-care. The US needs a system like Australia which is better than the UK or Canadian models. It is simply untrue that the US has the highest quality health-care because "people come here from other countries for serious treatment". I can't imagine anyone coming to the US for treatment from France, Japan, Australia (top 3 by WHO standards), or the other 25 countries in between (USA is 29th).

Comment from Bingo!
Medical Malpractice is the biggest concern in Australia. We should learn from this and regulate how much money lawyers make. That is one "socialization" we can all be proud of!! Regulate the lawyers!!!

Comment from Bingo!
Medical Malpractice is the biggest concern in Australia. We should learn from this and regulate how much money lawyers make. That is one "socialization" we can all be proud of!! Regulate the lawyers!!!

Comment from edward
I have experience in both England and Australia. I found that the care was excellent. The waiting was less than I experienced in US. The cost of their madical system is less than 1/2 and with overhead of 5% our overhead is 35% . the insurance co. co are paid millions . the post graduate training system for doctrs in England is better also and doctors in hospitals are paid workers who don't waste time thinking about cpt codes . I am happy with my doctor in us though, even though he is mostly money orientated.

Comment from Cameron Brister
Thanks, good info. I'm trying to compare succesful (top five infant mortality and life expectancy outcomes) with US and Canada statistics and systems.

Comment from donald bell
We now have Stephen Duckett in Alberta and are wondering if he will improve our system or hatchet it to the shape of things he just left. At present we have no private health insurance to speak of. Our past experience is that this staunch Conservative government wishes to privatize the health system. Viewing some past events with their "cronies" this thought strikes fear into those with any sense of the privilege system that works here. I would be interested to hear how effective his changes were in Australia and also what the negative sides are, nothing is perfect.

Comment from Darren
Thank you very much for this article and the opinions within. I currently live in the US but if "we" are unable to provide affordable health care in the near future I will be moving to a country that can :)

Comment from Mike
I think tort reform as a way to reform the US healthcare system is largely overrated. First of all, many states like Indiana already have limits on cases and awards. In IN you must first go through a medicaL review board before you can sue. Then even if you win the limit is $300,000, no matter what you future lost wages and medical bills will be as a result of the mistake. I have a better idea, why not force the incompetent doctors out of practice cause I have never heard of a single doctor having his or her license revoked and yet there must be a ton loosing malpractice suits. Doctors do not police themselves. Finally, all the complainst about the lawyers when it is the juries giving the awards, not lawyers. I'm amazed that the rightwingers want tort reform while they cry for free market and less regulation. I have faith in juries and the court system already has rules that get rid of all the so called frivolous lawsuits. In the federal rules, it's called Rules 11 and 12. Not only can plaintiffs be made to pay, but lawyers who file baseless lawsuits could be disbarred since it's unethical.

Comment from Jessica Toohey
Thank you so much for this artical. I live in the US, born and raised and am now 24 yrs old. I am sickend by the US health care system. Due to an accident my sister had to file bankrupcy at age 25, we have to pay out the ear for everything, even tho i have employer based insruance. there is nothing right about our system. i work for aarp and take calls concerning this health care reform all day long, and hear horror stories from the older population about the lack of care they recieve. I have been considering moving to Aussie for about a year, and have began saving money to make this move by january 2011, and i couldnt be more happy about it!

Comment from Jed
Mike, the real "tort reform" that needs to happen is not so much the caps of limits but rather "loser pays" which is when you bring a frivolous lawsuit that you have to pay the defense's legal fees. People talking about US health care should actually bring up the little problem that the Constitution does not provide for an Australian style system. We may try to do it anyway, but it would be completely unconstitutional.

Comment from Marcy
I recently relocated back to the US from 13 yrs in Sydney, Australia. I had very affordable family insurance covering private hospital and extras (obygn, dental, vision, physical therapy, RX etc etc) along with my Medicare coverage. We all pay 1.5% medicare levy from our salary for this coverage. I had top notch medical care, was always able to see a doctor when sick, get blood work, tests, xrays etc. It's common to have to pay a gap fee, which for example is: If your doctor bill is $50, medicare's reimbursement might cover $45 per the government's set fee schedule, thus our out of pocket cost for the visit is $5. If you have a really bad year of illness, you can apply for the safety net and if your costs exceed a certain threshold, you get extra financial coverage for the bills. Being back in the US for 9 months has seen me without any health coverage. I'm out of pocket well over $4K in doctors visits and RX's, many times I can't go to the doctor when sick or have had to go to a public health center. Americans are so scared of change and what reform would mean. The US system is backwards, insurance costs are ridiculous, pre-existing exclusions are close to unethical to deny treatment, medical service's prices are so high, RX are through the roof. I would return to Australia's system without blinking an eye gladly paying into its system and paying for my private insurance coverage -- which was $130/month of which I was entitled to a 30% government rebate on it. Come on America - Get it together for the sake of everyone to have medical care.

Comment from Marcy
I recently relocated back to the US from 13 yrs in Sydney, Australia. I had very affordable family insurance covering private hospital and extras (obygn, dental, vision, physical therapy, RX etc etc) along with my Medicare coverage. We all pay 1.5% medicare levy from our salary for this coverage. I had top notch medical care, was always able to see a doctor when sick, get blood work, tests, xrays etc. It's common to have to pay a gap fee, which for example is: If your doctor bill is $50, medicare's reimbursement might cover $45 per the government's set fee schedule, thus our out of pocket cost for the visit is $5. If you have a really bad year of illness, you can apply for the safety net and if your costs exceed a certain threshold, you get extra financial coverage for the bills. Being back in the US for 9 months has seen me without any health coverage. I'm out of pocket well over $4K in doctors visits and RX's, many times I can't go to the doctor when sick or have had to go to a public health center. Americans are so scared of change and what reform would mean. The US system is backwards, insurance costs are ridiculous, pre-existing exclusions are close to unethical to deny treatment, medical service's prices are so high, RX are through the roof. I would return to Australia's system without blinking an eye gladly paying into its system and paying for my private insurance coverage -- which was $130/month of which I was entitled to a 30% government rebate on it. Come on America - Get it together for the sake of everyone to have medical care.

Comment from liz
when was this article written?

Please provide a comment
Name
Email Address
Website
Comment